@Article{
AUTHOR = {Belshaw, Christopher Belshaw},
TITLE = {Anti-Natalism and the Asymmetry},
JOURNAL = {Journal of Controversial Ideas},
VOLUME = {4},
YEAR = {2024},
NUMBER = {1},
PAGES = {0--0},
URL = {https://journalofcontroversialideas.org/article/4/1/270},
ISSN = {2694-5991},
ABSTRACT = {What should we think about starting good lives? On one view starting such lives is required. On another this is forbidden. There’s a third view, occupying a middle position. And according to what Jeff McMahan calls the Asymmetry, starting such lives is permitted but not required. Most of us will incline to this third view, finding the first to be somewhat, the second highly controversial. But I argue that this middle position is untenable, and, further, that the first position is weaker, the second stronger than it initially appears. This isn’t, however, to support David Benatar’s well-known Anti-Natalist stance. I explain how our versions of this view differ, and show how mine is the one to favour. Of critical importance throughout is an appeal to personhood.},
DOI = {10.35995/jci04010005}
}