@Article{
AUTHOR = {Hillier-Smith, Bradley Hillier-Smith},
TITLE = {On What Matters for Obligations to Refugees},
JOURNAL = {Journal of Controversial Ideas},
VOLUME = {4},
YEAR = {2024},
NUMBER = {2},
PAGES = {0--0},
URL = {https://journalofcontroversialideas.org/article/4/2/285},
ISSN = {2694-5991},
ABSTRACT = {Rindermann et al.’s article concludes that certain refugees may have a lower IQ and as a result may not provide as significant an economic contribution to host states compared to the average citizen, and so may be an economic cost. This commentary first casts doubt on this conclusion. It then, and most importantly, demonstrates that even if this conclusion were true, it would be irrelevant insofar as it would have no moral or legal significance in mitigating or defeating obligations towards refugees. The commentary shows that any normative view that IQ and economic contributions can mitigate or defeat obligations to provide protection has unacceptable implications. The commentary then demonstrates that legal and moral obligations to refugees are in no part contingent on IQ and economic contributions and to suppose otherwise would simply represent a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature, grounds, and weight of obligations towards refugees. Hence, supposed IQ or economic contributions are entirely irrelevant to, and cannot undermine the strength of, refugees’ claims to protection nor states’ obligations to provide it.},
DOI = {10.35995/jci04020019}
}