@Article{
AUTHOR = {Jussim, Lee Jussim and Shifman, Mikhail Shifman and Maroja, Luana Maroja and Coyne, Jerry Coyne and Bertioli, David Bertioli and Warshel, Arieh Warshel and Frenking, Gernot Frenking and Bentley, Barry L. Bentley},
TITLE = {On the Intellectual Freedom and Responsibility of Scientists in the Time of “Consequences Culture”},
JOURNAL = {Journal of Controversial Ideas},
VOLUME = {5},
YEAR = {2025},
NUMBER = {2},
PAGES = {0--0},
URL = {https://journalofcontroversialideas.org/article/5/2/295},
ISSN = {2694-5991},
ABSTRACT = { The 20th century witnessed unimaginable atrocities perpetrated in the name of ideologies that stifled dissent in favour of political narratives, with numerous examples of resulting long-term societal harm. Despite clear historical precedents, calls to deal with dissent through censorship have risen dramatically. Most alarmingly, politically motivated censorship has risen in the academic community, where pluralism is most needed to seek truth and generate knowledge. Recent calls for censorship have come under the name of “consequences culture”, a culture structured around the inclusion of those sharing a particular narrative while imposing adverse consequences on those who dissent. Here, we place “consequences culture” in the historical context of totalitarian societies, focusing on the fate suffered by academics in those societies. We support our arguments with extensive references, many of which are not widely known in the West. We invite the broader scientific community to consider yet again what are timeless subjects: the importance of freely exchanging views and ideas; the freedom to do so without fear of intimidation; the folly of undermining such exchanges with distortions; and the peril of attempting to eliminate exchanges by purging published documents from the official record. We conclude with suggestions on where to go from here.},
DOI = {10.63466/jci05020007}
}