%0 Journal Article
%A Pilgrim, David Pilgrim
%D 2026
%J Journal of Controversial Ideas

%@ 2694-5991

%V 6
%N 2
%P 18

%T Sokal’s Response to Simpson and Srinivasan on Limiting Academic Freedom: A Critical Realist Commentary
%M doi:10.63466/jci06020018
%U https://journalofcontroversialideas.org/article/6/2/330
%X Using critical realism as a resource, this response to Sokal (2026) seeks to reinforce, not undermine, his overall critique in this journal of Simpson and Srinivasan (2018), referencing their justifications for some limited restrictions on academic freedom. With that supportive intention in mind, his use of some terms, such as ‘sociological’ and ‘epistemic’, is brought into question and the omission of a central consideration of ontology is highlighted. Sokal retains an epistemological focus and links this to axiology. If that linkage is also considered in relation to ontology, his arguments would have had greater force. An augmentation of his position with critical realism would vindicate his conclusions but require that positivism, not just postmodernism, is critiqued for the limitations it too places upon truth-inducting activity in higher education. In my view, the defence of academic freedom Sokal adopts would be strengthened by these additional considerations.