Journal of Controversial Ideas

(ISSN: 2694-5991) Open Access Journal
Rss Feed:
Controversial Ideas 2026, 6(1), 1; doi: 10.63466/jci06010001

The Equality Paradox

1 Author email:
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 16 Nov 2025 / Accepted: 17 Mar 2026 / Published: 10 May 2026
View Full-text Download PDF (438kb)

Abstract

Group differences in average cognitive ability are often considered the most controversial topic in psychology, and various attempts have been made to suppress research in this area. Supporters of these measures have justified them on the grounds that such research is socially harmful. However, in recent years the assumption that all demographic groups have equal average ability has been a major cause of racial discrimination in the United States. This discrimination has most frequently been directed against high-achieving groups, on the grounds that they have not legitimately earned their success. Separately, within the American criminal justice system the same assumption has resulted in racial discrimination with respect to which defendants receive the death penalty. In order to uphold a non-discriminatory society consistent with the principles of liberalism, research about group differences should not be suppressed, and should instead be used responsibly to oppose these forms of prejudice.
Keywords: intelligence; cognitive ability; race; discrimination; equity; liberalism; IQ commensurability; research ethics
OPEN ACCESS
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
CITE
Tezuka, S. The Equality Paradox. Controversial Ideas 2026, 6, 1.
Tezuka S. The Equality Paradox. Controversial Ideas. 2026; 6(1):1.
Tezuka, Shuichi. 2026. "The Equality Paradox." Controversial Ideas 6, no. 1: 1.
Not implemented
SHARE